Public work programs(PWP) can be a promising government instrument in addressing unemployment and poverty in developing countries such as the Philippines. Toward this end, the study seeks to examine the effectiveness of the two PWPs-the Tulong Panghanapbuhay para sa Disadvantaged/Displaced Workers (TUPAD) and Cash-for Work-using the Social Protection Public Work Programs Assessment Tool or “PWP Tool”. Due to the mobility restrictions caused by the COVID-19 pandemic, the study’s methodology has been limited to desk research, particularly analysis of pertinent issuances. Scrutiny of both the programs’ design and components through their guidelines revealed that while both satisfy to some extent the prescribed key areas under the PWP Tool, they fall short on inclusivity, complaint mechanism, graft prevention measures, and transparency. In this light, the study recommends that both PWP guidelines be reviewed and amended accordingly to include specific provisions on the promotion of inclusiveness among vulnerable workers particularly women; on handling complaints and addressing corrupt practices; and screening meaningful projects and activities under both PWPs.
This publication has been cited time(s).