LATEST PUBLICATIONS
PIDS EPM 2020-2021
Reset and Rebuild for a Better Philippines in the Post-pandemic World
DLSU-AKI Working Paper Series 2021-11-079
Examining and Evaluating the Multidimensional Energy Poverty Index (MEPI) in the Philippine Household Context
DLSU-AKI Working Paper Series 2021-11-078
A Game Theoretic Study on CSR and Government Intervention for Sustainable Production
DLSU-AKI Working Paper Series 2021-11-077
Obstacles to Economic Freedom Affecting Micro, Small, and Medium Enterprises (MSMEs) in Southeast Asian Countries

LATEST AV MATERIALS
PIDS WB 2021-1104
Assessing the Philippines' Performance in Meeting the ASEAN Economic Community Vision 2025
PIDS WB 2021-1103
Examining The Health Impacts Of The COVID-19 Pandemic In The Philippines
ILS-AVP-01
ILS 30th Anniversary Video
PIDS WB 2021-1102
Evaluating the Pantawid Pamilyang Pilipino Program's Payment System
Publication Detail
CSPPS WP 2014-04: Marketing Margins in Philippine Fisheries Industry and Its Implication to Sectoral Poverty: An Empirical Analysis Anchored on the Milkfish Industry

This paper is intended for policymakers and officials of government agencies--specifically the Philippine Department of Agriculture, the Bureau of Fisheries and Aquatic Resources, and other agencies mandated to promote the welfare of the domestic fisheries industry. Tasked to steer direction of the Philippine fisheries industry, it is primal for these policymakers to know the following current-day startling industry facts: our fishermen posted the highest level of poverty incidence among the nine basic sectors despite our vast fishery resources, the dominant role our country plays in the global fishing industry and its contribution to the local economy. Thus, the policy objective is to determine the best policy option that will improve the income of fishermen without putting into jeopardy food security.

To determine potential reasons for the low incomes among fishermen, the dynamics governing the fisheries marketing system was studied using data from the BAS. It was found out that the price of fish is increasing and that the share of fishermen to prices paid for by consumers is decreasing. In addition, there is a strong evidence of market power imposed upon fish producers/fishermen by the retailers. The paper also attempted to review existing policies and legislation related to fisheries marketing and credit from the works of Hernando (2002).

Four policy alternatives were presented for consideration and these are: (1) status quo or maintaining of current conditions; (2) government intervention in the input and output market; (3) income transfer/area payments; and (4) development of market institutions like establishment of commodity board tasked to rationalize industry-specific infrastructures, market information, regulation and coordination, legal mechanisms, and specific market-based risk measures.

Advantages and disadvantages of each policy option were presented. Using effectiveness, sustainability, efficiency, flexibility, institutional constraints, and sector performance as criteria, it was found out that the best policy option to address the short term goal of addressing poverty among the fishermen without putting into jeopardy food security is government intervention in the input and output market.

It was also suggested that while addressing short-term objectives, foundations that will address the major problem of market inefficiency have to be simultaneously addressed. This includes industry rationalization through development of market institutions with private sector on the lead. In addition, market inefficiencies can be corrected so that the market power that exists can be reduced if not totally eliminated.



UPLB Center for Strategic Planning and Policy Studies
Authors Keywords
Tan, Reynold; fisheries; marketing margins; fish industry; conjecture; Department of Agriculture; Bureau of Fisheries and Aquatic Resources;
Download PDF Number of Downloads
Published in 2014 and available in the CSPPS-CPAf, UP Los BaƱos, College, Laguna or Downloaded 354 times since October 26, 2016
×
Please let us know your reason for downloading this publication. May we also ask you to provide additional information that will help us serve you better? Rest assured that your answers will not be shared with any outside parties. It will take you only two minutes to complete the survey. Thank you.


To use as reference:
If others, (Please specify):
Name: (optional)
Email: (required, but will not display)
Age:
Gender:
If Prefer to self-describe, please specify:
Level of Education:
Occupation:
If employed either part-time or full-time, name of office:
If others, (Please specify):
Would you like to receive the SERP-P UPDATES e-newsletter? Yes No
Use the space below if you have any comment about this publication or SERP-P knowledge resources in general.