DLSU-AKI Policy Brief, Volume XII, No. 5
Assessing the Potential Impacts of Reducing Philippine Corporate Income Tax and Reforming Sectoral Incentives on Poverty and Employment
DP 2020-23
Innovating Governance: Building Resilience against COVID-19 Pandemic and Other Risks
PN 2020-07
Bottlenecks to formalization of small-scale mining in PH
Technology and Investment Profile of Soybean Roast Products
Publication Detail
NCPAG PJPA 2005-3-4: Is there water after privatization? The case of the Metropolitan Waterworks and Sewerage System

The study highlights the commonalities and differences of the New Public Administration and the Discourse Theory. New Public Administration was born out of the tumultuous environment of the 60s, while the Discourse Theory was prompted by the hyperreality of the fragmented society in the 90s. Both theories share the belief in and respect for individual's own experience, and dominance of public interest above all values to predicate public action and the rejection of the command-and-control bureaucratic structure in policymaking and implementation. The two theories diverge in their respective formulations of location of public engagements. New Public Administration suggests use of models of task force, matrix, project, terms, devolution, etc. to facilitate client participation in shaping public policy, while the Discourse theory explicates the importance of transforming the bureaucracy into one permeable, situational public energy field.

UP-National College of Public Administration and Governance
Authors Keywords
De Jesus, Leonila D.; discourse analysis; gender perspective; New Public Management (NPM); Politics and public administration; Administrative theories; MinnowBrook Conference; Social equity;
Download PDF Number of Downloads
Published in 2005 and available in the UP NCPAG Library or can be downloaded as full text Downloaded 228 times since October 25, 2018