Regulatory Impact Assessment Adoption Determinants: A Diagnostic Framework
Exploring Responses to the Employment Impact of Excise Tax Reform: The Case of the Philippine Tobacco Industry
Mapping Out Employment Opportunities in the Cultural Heritage Sector A Strategic Framework
Enhancing Decent Work Outcomes in Small-Scale Gold Mining

PIDS WB 2021-0904
Annual Public Policy Conference Webinar 3: Green And Inclusive Recovery
PIDS WB 2021-0903
Annual Public Policy Conference Webinar 2: Ethical Business
PIDS WB 2021-0902
Opening Program and Annual Public Policy Conference Webinar 1: Resetting Capitalism
PIDS WB 2021-0901
19th Development Policy Research Month Kick-Off Forum
Publication Detail
NCPAG PJPA 2003-1-4: HRD reforms in the bureaucracy

This study was designed with the objective of gathering - so as to facilitate evaluation - the varied and often contradictory positions of regulation in Sri Lanka, both among the regulators themselves, and the perception of their actions among various stakeholders. By analyzing the functioning of the telecommunications regulatory agency and the proposed multisector utilities regulatory agency, it hopes to identify the actual regulatory practices in use and thereby offer long-term corrective measures, if any were needed. In terms of this analysis, the main point of reference was the Regulatory Impact Assessment (RIA) methodology developed in collaboration with our research partners at the Center on Regulation and Competition (CRC), Manchester. Furthermore, it is the view of the authors that this system, if applied to Sri Lanka, could greatly negate the multifarious problems that plague regulation: poor decisionmaking, and regulatory capture posing the worst threats. The findings of this study were not surprising in any way: regulatory processes are conducted in an ad hoc manner with little heed given to transparency and accountability, resulting in very few positive outcomes. Moreover, progress towards the establishment of a systematic process is slow and the adoption of a stringent (or any) impact assessment practice is being sidelined due to a perceived need to expedite the liberalization of the economy at all costs. The main recommendation of this study is that the only way forward, with an eye on progress towards a better era of regulation, is through the creation of awareness of the benefits of RIA among all stakeholders. It is hoped that a greater level of objectivity will gradually be infused into the regulatory processes in Sri Lanka once such a system is adopted.

UP-National College of Public Administration and Governance
Authors Keywords
Knight-John, Malathy; Jayasinghe, Shanta; Perumal, Andrew; Information and Communications Commission of Sri Lanka (ICCSL); Liberalization -- Sri Lanka; Privatization policies -- Sri Lanka; Public Utilities Commission of Sri Lanka (PUCSL); Regulatory impact assessment -- Sri Lanka; Sri Lanka Institute of Developme;
Download PDF Number of Downloads
Published in 2003 and available in the UP NCPAG Library or Downloaded 107 times since October 25, 2018
Please let us know your reason for downloading this publication. May we also ask you to provide additional information that will help us serve you better? Rest assured that your answers will not be shared with any outside parties. It will take you only two minutes to complete the survey. Thank you.

To use as reference:
If others, (Please specify):
Name: (optional)
Email: (required, but will not display)
If Prefer to self-describe, please specify:
Level of Education:
If employed either part-time or full-time, name of office:
If others, (Please specify):
Would you like to receive the SERP-P UPDATES e-newsletter? Yes No
Use the space below if you have any comment about this publication or SERP-P knowledge resources in general.