LATEST PUBLICATIONS
NEDA 7 COVID-19 RRP 2020-2022
Central Visayas COVID-19 Regional Recovery Program 2020-2022
NEDA 7 RDP 2017-2022 Midterm
Central Visayas Regional Development Plan 2017-2022 Midterm Update
NEDA 7 RDRA 2017-2022
Central Visayas Regional Development Research Agenda 2017-2022
NEDA 7 RDR 2019
Central Visayas Regional Development Report 2019

LATEST AV MATERIALS
PIDS WB 2021-1201
Analyzing the President's Budget for 2022
GIZ-FFS-2020-01
WASHaLOT 3.0: Production Process
GIZ-FFS-2021-03
WASHaLOT 3.0 Mass Production
GIZ-FFS-2021-02
Minimum Requirement Guidelines on WASH in Schools
Publication Detail
RPS 2015-02: Review and Assessment of Programs Offered by State Universities and Colleges

The state universities and colleges (SUCs) in the Philippines have always been a major issue mainly because of the poor quality of education that most of them offer, the undeveloped management and financial systems, and the inequality of access. And yet the government has been providing them considerable funding support (e.g., the budget allocation for FY 2012 amounts to PHP 26 billion) primarily due to the importance of tertiary education in promoting human development and improving the economy's competitiveness.

A review of the mandates of the various SUCs in the selected regions covered by this study indicates that the mandates are fairly broad, to start with. But beyond this, the charters of most SUCs allow them to offer programs outside of their core mandates. Given the broad mandates of SUCs, there is, therefore, a substantial duplication in their program offerings. The high rates of program duplication appeared to be associated with an increase in the number of programs offered by SUCs during the period. Although SUCs perform better than private higher education institutions (PHEIs) in over 84 percent of professional board examinations (PBEs), SUCs have been able to improve their advantage further relative to PHEIs in the last seven years in 31 percent of the PBEs. Perhaps what is more worrisome than the persistently low overall average passing rate in PBEs is the preponderance of SUCs/PHEIs with zero passing rates in many PBEs during 2004–2011. The study offers some recommendations; among others, the Commission on Higher Education needs to enforce more vigorously its policy of closing existing programs of SUCs and PHEIs that perform under par year after year; and more effective measures to improve the quality of instruction should include faculty development and facilities upgrading.



Philippine Institute for Development Studies
Authors Keywords
Manasan, Rosario G.; Parel, Danileen Kristel C.; Philippines; state universities and colleges (SUCs); private higher education institutions (PHEIs); program offerings; passing rates; board exam;
Download PDF Number of Downloads
Published in 2015 and available in the PIDS Library or Downloaded 2,276 times since July 08, 2015
×
Please let us know your reason for downloading this publication. May we also ask you to provide additional information that will help us serve you better? Rest assured that your answers will not be shared with any outside parties. It will take you only two minutes to complete the survey. You will answer the profile questions only once as long as you enter the same email address. Thank you.


To use as reference:
If others, (Please specify):
Name: (optional)
Email: (required, but will not display; please use the same email address when downloading another publication so that the profile questions will not appear)
Age:
Gender:
If Prefer to self-describe, please specify:
Level of Education:
Occupation:
If employed either part-time or full-time, name of office:
If others, (Please specify):
Would you like to receive the SERP-P UPDATES e-newsletter? Yes No
Use the space below if you have any comment about this publication or SERP-P knowledge resources in general.