PN 2022-02
How Can DSWD's Social Pension Program for Indigent Senior Citizens be Improved?
RPS 2022-01
How Does the Philippines Fare in Meeting the ASEAN Economic Community Vision 2025?
PJD 2022 Vol. 46 No. 1d
Surveying the Extent and Wage Consequences of Education-Job Mismatches in the Philippine Labor Market
PJD 2022 Vol. 46 No. 1c
Disentangling the Effects of Maternal Employment on Child Stunting in the Philippines

PIDS WB 2021-1201
Analyzing the President's Budget for 2022
WASHaLOT 3.0: Production Process
WASHaLOT 3.0 Mass Production
Minimum Requirement Guidelines on WASH in Schools
Publication Detail
CLSU 2002-06: Economic Evaluation of Freshwater Aquaculture Technologies and Policies in Selected Production Systems

The program generally aimed to perform an economic evaluation of Freshwater Aquaculture Technologies (FAT) and policies in selected production systems. It has two project components; one dealt with the analysis of matured FATs both at micro and macro levels (specifically its effects on fish supplies, income, consumption, and employment); the other dealt with policy studies on the role of fishery organizations, land use and fishery rights, dissemination strategies, and trade- related concerns. The nature of the studies required the collection of primary and secondary data. For the primary survey, 540 adopters and 108 non-adopters were interviewed in Luzon covering three top producing regions. The same sampling frame applied to the choice of provinces, towns and barangays. But at the barangay level, 8 adopter-respondents while 2 non-adopter-respondents were selected. The areas covered were Nueva Ecija, Bulacan and Pampanga for fishponds and hatcheries; Laguna, Batangas, and Isabela for fish cage/pens and hatcheries. The matured FATs are focused on grow-out and hatchery. For grow-out system, it included fishponds, cages, and pens. The technologies under grow-out were on broodstock improvement, level of management (extensive, semi-extensive, and intensive), and post harvest activities. For the hatchery component, the study looked at pond, hapa, and tank. The sex-reversed tilapia was included under this component. The preliminary results of Study 1 under Project 1 were focused on the identification of financial benefits and costs of the matured technologies. The yield difference between adopters and non-adopters was 3,030 kg per cycle or about 59% in favor of adopters. Hence, there is an impression that the technology had benefited the adopters. Likewise, Study 2 of Project 1 identified and assessed the economic benefits and costs of FATs. It found out that tilapia’s contribution to aquaculture was around 9.46% annually from 1992-2000. During the same period, tilapia production had behaved cyclically with an upswing in the first three years, downswing in the middle three years, and another upswing in the last three years. Historically, the significant government programs related to the fishery sector were the Kilusang Kabuhayan at Kaunlaran Biyayang Dagat Program, CB-NFAC Supervised Credit Program, among others. Under Study 1 of Project 2, the organizations were identified and classified as Fisheries Organizations, Fisheries and Agricultural Resource Management Council, and Cooperatives. The organizations were generally aimed to provide technical, financial, and marketing assistance to members. However, the sustainability of these services was delimited by lack of sufficient funds hence, most organizations had failed to deliver and sustain those services to their members. Study 2 made a preliminary review of relevant local laws, rules, regulations, and ordinances within the spirit of the Fisheries Administrative Code. All of the ordinances were meant to ban the use of illegal fishing methods or practices, which are detrimental to fish population, environmental protection and the like. However, the respondents qualified that its aggressive enforcement happened only during the onset of its implementation in the late 80’s. Study 3 focused on determining the most effective dissemination strategy of FAT to intended clienteles. Training programs administered by BFAR, DA, LGUs and Santeh Feed Company were the dominant dissemination mode for FAT. The use of print media such as brochure/leaflet/techno guides came next as important mode while the use of broadcast media was the least preferred. Study 4 had shown that the trade policies of the country in 1960s up to 1980s were characterized by lifting of import and foreign exchange restrictions; on and off imposition of quantitative restrictions, and tariff rates. But in the mid 90s, major tariff reform programs were implemented until the country’s accession to the WTO-GATT accord. In 1996, quantitative restrictions were lifted, tariff rates for sensitive agricultural products were raised while minimum access volume to these products were defined. The fishery sector was still protected as indicated by positive Effective Protection Rates (EPRs). The trade balance volume of the sector remained negative in most years (from 1990-2000). However, the value of trade balance remained positive, which indicates better terms of trade for fishery products in the export markets. To know the impacts of trade reform on the sector, the initial regression results revealed that the real GDP and (production) was positively (negatively) and significantly affected by EPR.

Central Luzon State University
Authors Keywords
Buenavista, Marijoy M.; Frias, Nuela O.; Jamandre, Wilfred E.; Marzan, Eduardo G., Jr.; Mescallado, Helen M.; Recto, Melicent M.S.; Saturno, Janet O.; Vitug, Edelyn G.; fresh water aquaculture technology;
Download PDF Number of Downloads
Published in 2006 and available in the CLSU library or NO PDF AVAILABLE Downloaded 0 times since November 25, 2011
Please let us know your reason for downloading this publication. May we also ask you to provide additional information that will help us serve you better? Rest assured that your answers will not be shared with any outside parties. It will take you only two minutes to complete the survey. You will answer the profile questions only once as long as you enter the same email address. Thank you.

To use as reference:
If others, (Please specify):
Name: (optional)
Email: (required, but will not display; please use the same email address when downloading another publication so that the profile questions will not appear)
If Prefer to self-describe, please specify:
Level of Education:
If employed either part-time or full-time, name of office:
If others, (Please specify):
Would you like to receive the SERP-P UPDATES e-newsletter? Yes No
Use the space below if you have any comment about this publication or SERP-P knowledge resources in general.