Philippine Standard time

GATT-UR and Philippine Agriculture: Facts and Fallacies


GATT-UR provisions on agriculture have been most controversial. Its ratification depends on the establishment of adequate “safety nets” to protect farmers from the anticipated adverse welfare impacts of the GATT-UR implementation. This paper argues that the global and Philippine trade liberalization in the spirit of GATT-UR will benefit the poor and farmers. Senate should therefore ratify the agreements to allow the government to attend their business of carrying out economic and institutional reform for sustainable economic growth.


Citations

This publication has been cited time(s).

  1. David, Cristina C., Ponciano Intal, and Arsenio M. Balisacan, 2007 "Distortions to agricultural incentives in the Philippines" , World Bank

  2. Cororaton, Caesar B., 1997 "Simulating the effects of GATT-UR/WTO on the Philippine economy" , Philippine Institute for Development Studies



Related Publications

Asian Journal of Agriculture and Development Vol. 11 No. 1

SEARCA
SEARCA AJAD 2014 11-1
2014
175 Downloads
Cite
Downloads

945

Since
Jul 09, 2013