DP 2020-23
Innovating Governance: Building Resilience against COVID-19 Pandemic and Other Risks
PN 2020-07
Bottlenecks to formalization of small-scale mining in PH
Technology and Investment Profile of Soybean Roast Products
Technology and Investment Profile of Soya Chips
Publication Detail
NCPAG PJPA 2004-4: The Bontok Igorot tribe: an internal scanning of its governance system

The lack of a clear social change theory from which participation is based could render it vulnerable to manipulation by the power holders for their own interest. It can mean differently to different people especially those who have the capacity to influence the institutions that conceptualize and employ it. More importantly, any attempt to make participatory governance/development part of Public Administration (PA) discipline without enough theoretical grounding can make it a constant bone of contention, the outcome of which will be decided by whoever has the greater resources to influence research and publication. This article, then, aims to establish a development theory to provide context to the discourse of transformative citizenship and participation. It is an attempt to provide and ideological anchor to participation by conceptualizing transformative citizenship out of civic republicanism, thus, redefining some basic assumptions on citizenship such as rights, group rights, agency, identity and location among others. Further, it discusses the role of transformative citizenship in transforming Philippine Public Administration both as a discipline and as a practice. It also seeks to redefine the significant role of Philippine Public Administration in pushing for democratic governance.

UP-National College of Public Administration and Governance
Authors Keywords
Manalo, Fermin P.; Public administration -- Trends; Citizenship -- Social aspects; Participatory development;
Download PDF Number of Downloads
Published in 2004 and available in the UP NCPAG Library or can be downloaded as full text Downloaded 220 times since October 25, 2018