LATEST PUBLICATIONS
NEDA 7 COVID-19 RRP 2020-2022
Central Visayas COVID-19 Regional Recovery Program 2020-2022
NEDA 7 RDP 2017-2022 Midterm
Central Visayas Regional Development Plan 2017-2022 Midterm Update
NEDA 7 RDRA 2017-2022
Central Visayas Regional Development Research Agenda 2017-2022
NEDA 7 RDR 2019
Central Visayas Regional Development Report 2019

LATEST AV MATERIALS
PIDS WB 2021-1201
Analyzing the President's Budget for 2022
GIZ-FFS-2020-01
WASHaLOT 3.0: Production Process
GIZ-FFS-2021-03
WASHaLOT 3.0 Mass Production
GIZ-FFS-2021-02
Minimum Requirement Guidelines on WASH in Schools
Publication Detail
TRJ 2008 Vol XX No 6-b: Revenue Performance of Local Governments, CYs 2003 - 2007, November-December 2008

The study reviews the revenue performance of local government units (LGUs) from CYs 2003 – 2007 and the extent of utilization of their taxing and revenue raising powers to serve as baseline to any proposed policy reforms in the area of local government finance. Local government revenues are derived from two major sources: local and external. Revenues sourced locally include those coming from property taxes, business tax, and other locally imposed taxes as well as non-tax revenues from operation and miscellaneous income and capital revenues. On the other hand, external source include shares from the internal revenue allotment (IRA), shares from proceeds derived from the development and utilization of national wealth, other shares from national taxes provided under special laws, grants and aids. The enactment of the LGC in 1991 broadened the authority of LGUs to utilize available and potential sources of revenue and strengthen their fiscal position to enable them to provide adequate services to their constituents. However, sixteen (16) years after the enactment of the LGC, it has been noted that the dependency of the LGUs on IRA has not diminished which to a certain extent leads, to the underutilization of local revenue sources. From 2003 to 2007, the average annual revenues of LGUs totaled P 194.71 billion. Of this amount, P 65.46 billion or 33.57% came from local sources while P 129. 35 billion or 66.43% from external sources, the sizeable portion of which (P 125.63 billion or 64.54%), was contributed by the IRA. The gap between the local sources and the IRA in terms of shares to total local government revenues is indicative of the failure of most LGUs to maximize the revenue-raising powers bestowed on them under the LGC and their preference to depend on IRA for their funding needs. The steady growth of the IRA thus served as a disincentive for LGUs to exploit their revenue-generating powers and improve tax collection efficiency. Problems attendant to the administration and collection of locally-generated sources like property taxes and business taxes further aggravated the situation and deterred the potential of these tax sources to become major revenue sources of local governments. In this respect, the recommendations of the recent studies of NTRC and LAMP with regard to locally generated sources of revenues should be given consideration by LGUs. With regard to the IRA, the application of appropriate incentives or indicators of revenue performance as basis for the allocation of IRA to LGUs may be introduced. This can provide a major inducement to enhance the taxing capacity of LGUs. One measure of revenue performance is the collection effiency, which measures the extent to which a local unit makes use of its taxing potential to generate the maximum amount of revenue. It may be worthwhile to mention the strategies adopted by some LGUs to enhance revenue generation and mobilization which can be duplicated or from which other LGUs can draw some insights, as follows: 1. The provincial government of Nueva Ecija - conducted among others, a “door-to-door” service for taxpayers in remote barangays whereby property assessments is done by roving government teams. 2. Iligan City – set up among others a “one-stop-shop” for the taxpayers to be in one complex to make all the necessary payments and initiated business mapping. 3. San Fernando, Pampanga – conducted tax mapping in all their barangays and came up with a master list of establishments operating within the city. 4. Muntinlupa City – adopted the Real Property Tax Computerization and Administration Technology (RPTA) in their system for better service. 5. Quezon City – conducted among others, property auctions for delinquent RPT taxpayers, applied presumptive minimum gross sales/receipts levels for business tax and for markets.

National Tax Research Center
Authors Keywords
National Tax Research Center; Philippines; Iligan City; tax collection; revenue performance; Internal Revenue Allotment (IRA); Local Government Units (LGUs); Nueva Ecija; San Fernando; Pampanga; Muntinlupa City; Quezon City;
Download PDF Number of Downloads
Published in 2008 and available in the NTRC library or Downloaded 248 times since November 25, 2011
×
Please let us know your reason for downloading this publication. May we also ask you to provide additional information that will help us serve you better? Rest assured that your answers will not be shared with any outside parties. It will take you only two minutes to complete the survey. You will answer the profile questions only once as long as you enter the same email address. Thank you.


To use as reference:
If others, (Please specify):
Name: (optional)
Email: (required, but will not display; please use the same email address when downloading another publication so that the profile questions will not appear)
Age:
Gender:
If Prefer to self-describe, please specify:
Level of Education:
Occupation:
If employed either part-time or full-time, name of office:
If others, (Please specify):
Would you like to receive the SERP-P UPDATES e-newsletter? Yes No
Use the space below if you have any comment about this publication or SERP-P knowledge resources in general.